
|

The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy
|
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 611
Gurnee, IL 60031
Telephone:
(847)782-0224
Email:
bzager@msn.com
|
|
|
|
|
ABSTRACT: HIGH PREGNANCY RATES WITH IVF
SURROGACY
by: A. Jacobson. L. Weckstein, D.
Galen, K. Hampton, K. Ivani
Reproductive Science Center of the Bay Area
Fertility & Gynecology Medical Group, Inc.,
San Ramon, California 94583
The need for utilization of IVF Surrogacy is
well-established. The intended mother may have
an absent or defective uterus, repeated failure
with regular IVF, or have a medical
contraindication to a pregnancy. Our program has
offered IVF Surrogacy utilizing both the
intended mother's egg or donor eggs if the
initial option is not feasible. The following is
a report of our experience from 1995 through
June 1997 with fresh embryo transfer.
Oocytes were obtained following down regulation
with GnRH agonist followed by Follicle
Stimulating Hormone for follicular stimulation.
Surrogates were down regulated then stimulated
with oral estradiol. Luteal support was achieved
with both intramuscular and vaginal
progesterone. Generally 3 to 4 embryos were
transferred.
There were 12 IVF Surrogate Cases utilizing the
intended mother's own eggs. The average age of
the intended mothers was 36 years. The average
age of the surrogates was 38 years. The
imDlantation rate was 31%. The clinical
pregnancy and delivery rates was 83%.
There were 12 IVF Surrogate Cases using egg
donor. The average age of the intended mothers
was 44 years. The average age of the egg donors
was 27 years. The average age of the surrogates
was 33 years. The implantation rate was 23%. The
clinical pregnancy and delivery rate was 67% (2
surrogates in the 3rd Trimester).
In 22 Cases the partner of intended mother
provided the sperm. In 2 cases donor sperm was
used. In 3 cases ICSI was used. There were 1
delivered triplet pregnancy and 4 delivered twin
pregnancies. All patients had embryo transfers
and those who achieved a clinical pregnancy
delivered at least one viable baby.
Overall the 75% delivery rate per transfer
demonstrates the potential efficiency of human
reproduction.
HIGH PREGNANCY RATES WITH IVF SURROGACY
INTRODUCTION
The need for utilization of IVF surrogacy is
well-established. Limited case reports have
attested to its success. The initial successful
report was by Utian1 in 1985. The intended
mother may have an absent or defective uterus,
repeated failure with regular IVF, in spite of
producing good embryos, or having a medical
contraindication to pregnancy. Occasionally in
addition the intended mother may not be able to
produce eggs because of absent ovaries, a
genetic abnormality, poor ovarian reserve, or a
medical contra-indication to the IVF procedure.
Our program, The Reproductive Science Center of
the Bay Area Fertility and Gynecology Medical
Group, Inc. in San Ramon, has offered IVF
surrogacy utilizing both the intended mother or
donor eggs if the initial option is not
feasible. The following is a report of our
experience from January 1995 through June 1997
using fresh embryo transfers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All couples, oocyte donors and IVF surrogates
had a full medical and psychological screening.
Follicular stimulation with follicle stimulation
hormone was carried out after giving the oocyte
provider depot leuprolide in the luteal phase
and after down regulation was confirmed and
coordination with the surrogate occurred.
Transvaginal follicular aspiration was carried
out 36 hours following the midcycle human
chorionic gonadotropin injection.
The surrogate cycle was coordinated by using
daily leuprolide injections starting in the
luteal phase and then following menses using
increasing doses of oral estradiol, generally
starting at 2-4 ma. per day and then increasing
to 6-8 ma. per day at the end of the follicular
phase. The surrogate was then started on
progesterone in oil 50 ma. IM and micronized
progesterone capsules 200 ma. three times a day
vaginally starting on the day of egg retrieval.
The surrogate was also continued with 4 ma. of
oral Estradiol a day. Embryo transfer was
carried out either 48 or 72 hours following the
egg retrieval.
All pregnancies were confirmed by sonogram and
deliveries by direct contact with the surrogates
and the intended mothers.
RESULTS
For IVF surrogacy with intended mother's own
eggs the results are shown in Table 1. Six woman
had either an absent uterus or a sign)ficant
uterine problem; four had failed multiple IVF
cycles; two had medical contraindications. Five
women had relatives for their surrogates; two
had Jacobson et al good friends. Of the 49
embryos transferred, 15 implanted and 13 babies
delivered successfully. Donor sperm was used in
two cases (one azoospermia; one muscular
dystrophy). ICSI was used in one case. In Case
B-S only one fair quality embryo was
transferred. In Case DS, one of the two
unsuccessful cases, only one good quality embryo
was transferred. In Case BN., the other
unsuccessful case the surrogate had a chemical
pregnancy. The patient had her remaining frozen
embryos transferred to herself which resulted
only in another chemical pregnancy. All
surrogates developed a good endometrium. All
embryo transfers were routine except for case
P-M which nevertheless resulted in a delivered
twin pregnancy. One of the eight successful
cases who had frozen embryos has attempted a
frozen embryo transfer cycle which was
unsuccessful.
For IVF surrogacy with egg donation the results
are shown in Table 2. In six cases there was an
absent uterus and ovaries necessitating both an
ovum donor and a surrogate. Three cases involved
two sisters with muscular dystrophy which will
be described in detail later in this paper. The
remaining three cases have a variety of reasons
for this treatment. None of the oocyte donors or
surrogates were relatives of the intended
parents. In one case V-A-P both the oocyte donor
and the surrogate were friends of the intended
mother. Of the 56 embryos transferred, 13
implanted and 11 babies delivered successfully.
ICSI was used in two cases, both successful
pregnancies. All unsuccessful cycles were
subsequently followed by a successful cycle. In
one case, K-G-O by a delivered triplet
pregnancy, which auto-reduced from a quadruplet
pregnancy. In cases K-G-S and K-G-A, of the nine
embryos transferred, only three were fair
quality embryos and none were good quality
embryos. In C-A-D only one good and two fair
quality embryos were transferred. The first case
of L-R-W in which two good quality embryos were
transferred along with three fair and one poor
quality embryo, the result was a chemical
pregnancy. All surrogates developed a good
endometrium and all embryo transfers were
routine except for C-A-S which nevertheless
resulted in a successful pregnancy. None of the
f~ve successful cases who had frozen embryos has
attempted a frozen embryo transfer cycle.
Table 3 shows the summary data for IVF surrogacy
with the intended mother's own eggs and with
donor eggs. There were 12 cases with the
intended mother's own eggs and 12 cases with
donor eggs. All intended mothers whose surrogate
achieved a clinical pregnancy their surrogate
delivered at least one viable baby. There were
no birth defects or neonatal losses. Overall
there was one delivered triplet pregnancy and
four delivered twin pregnancies.
Two sisters with scapulohumeral muscular
dystrophy had extraordinary experiences. Both
sisters in their initial cycles used oocyte
donors and surrogates, because at the time of
their procedure there was no prenatal diagnosis
available and because their physical condition
did not allow them to carry a pregnancy to term.
Both cycles C-A-S and S-S-H resulted in
successful deliveries. One sister tried a second
cycle with the same donor (case C-A-D) which was
unsuccessful. Subsequent methodologies evolved
allowing the possibility of prenatal diagnosis
by chorionic villous biopsy by a program in the
Netherlands. The patient underwent another cycle
with her own eggs (case C-S) a five embryo
transfer including one good embryo resulted in a
twin
-2 -
Jacobson et
al
pregnancy in the surrogate. A chorionic villous
biopsy was carried out locally with the tissue
being frozen and shipped to the Netherlands.
Tests there revealed one normal baby and one
affected baby which was subsequently aborted. A
single, healthy infant was subsequently
delivered at 35 weeks gestation. To the best of
our knowledge this was the first prenatal
diagnosis which this type of scapulohumeral
muscular dystrophy.
DISCUSSION
The high success rate of 75% in 24 surrogate
cases utilizing both donor and intended mother's
eggs with fresh embryo transfers was gratifying.
Marrs2 previously reported a 22% clinical
pregnancy rate in fresh embryo transfers using
intended mothers' own eggs. The difference in
rates is probably partly the result of our
intended mothers' younger mean age.
The higher success rates with surrogates
compared with our own IVF program or even our
own oocyte donor program can be partly ascribed
to embryo transfers to a parous uterus
unburdened by gonadotropin stimulation. The most
important indicator of success was the quality
of the embryos. Now that most of our embryo
transfers are carried out three days following
egg recovery, we are recommending insertion of
only two high quality embryos in order to limit
the multiple pregnancy risk. The multiple
pregnancy risk with surrogacy in this series of
28% with one set of triplets is somewhat
excessive.
The 24 transfer cycles represent 19 couples.
Seventeen of the couples, or 89%, had a
successful surrogate delivery of a total of 24
babies; one couple had two successful surrogate
deliveries.
Overall the 75% delivery rate per transfer
demonstrates the potential efficacy of human
reproduction.
REFERENCES
1. Utian WH, Sheean L, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R.
Successful pregnancy after in vitro
fertilization-embryo transfer from an infertile
woman to a surrogate. N Engl J Med 1985: 313;
1351-1352.
2. Marrs RP. Gestational surrogacy -
Indications, practicalities, and results. 10th
Annual In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo
Transfer Update. Santa Barbara, California July
1997.
Table I - IVF SURROGACY-INTENDED MOTHER'S
OOCYTES
|
Case |
Patient Age |
Reason For Surrogacy |
Relation to Surrogate |
No. of Embryos Transferred |
No. of Pregnancy Sacs |
No. Babies Delivered |
|
P-M |
37 |
Multiple IVF Cycles |
-
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
|
V-C |
39 |
Multiple IVF Cycles |
Sister-in-Law |
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
T-D |
37 |
Multiple IVF Cycles |
Sister |
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
B-N |
39 |
Multiple IVF Cycles |
Friend |
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
M-C |
32 |
DES Uterus |
-
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
B-P |
40 |
Large Fibroids |
-
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
G-H |
38 |
large Fibroids |
-
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
C-C |
33 |
Asherman's |
Sister-in-Law |
3
|
2
|
2
|
|
O-T |
29 |
Hysterectomy |
Mother |
3
|
2
|
2
|
|
D-S |
34 |
Hysterectomy |
-
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
B-S |
35 |
Severe Diabetes |
Sister |
6
|
1
|
1
|
|
C-S |
38 |
Muscular Dystrophy |
Friend |
6
|
2
|
1
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
49 |
15 |
13 |
Table II - IVF Surrogacy Donor Oocytes
|
Case |
Donor Age |
Reason for Donor |
Reason for Surrogacy |
No. Embryos Transferred |
No. Pregnancy Sacs |
No. Babies Delivered |
|
C-A-S |
27 |
Muscular Dystrophy |
Muscular Dystrophy |
6
|
1
|
2
|
|
C-A-D |
28 |
Muscular Dystrophy |
Muscular Dystrophy |
7
|
0
|
0
|
|
S-S-H |
27 |
Muscular Dystrophy |
Muscular Dystrophy |
4
|
2
|
1
|
|
K-G-S |
22 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
K-G-A |
23 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
K-G-O |
23 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
4
|
4
|
3
|
|
S-H-W |
29 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
4
|
2
|
2
|
|
L-R-W |
26 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
L-R-W |
26 |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
Absent Uterus/Ovaries |
5
|
1
|
1
|
|
V-A-P |
30 |
Prior Poor Stimulation |
Prior Poor Stimulation |
5
|
1
|
1
|
|
S-F-S |
29 |
46 y/o Mother |
Des Uterus |
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
M-S-F |
29 |
Chronic Medical Condition |
Chronic Medical Condition |
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
TOTALS |
|
|
|
56 |
13 |
11 |
TABLE III - Pregnancy Rates With IVF Surrogacy
|
Source Of Ovum |
No. Of Cases |
Age Of Donor Mean |
Age of Surrogates Mean |
Implantation Rate |
Pregnancy Rate Per ET |
Delivery Rate Per ET |
|
Intended Mother |
12 |
36 |
38 |
31% |
83% |
83% |
|
Ovum Donor |
12 |
27 |
33 |
23% |
67% |
67% |
|
|
|
|
|
©
2007 OPTS - The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy
|
|